|
Post by Alyssa on Jun 29, 2009 17:53:42 GMT -5
I really want to do these. can we pleaseeeeeeee?!?!?
|
|
|
Post by Park on Jun 29, 2009 17:54:13 GMT -5
YES!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by kirin on Jun 29, 2009 17:58:52 GMT -5
wow, you are very enthusiastic
|
|
|
Post by andy on Jun 29, 2009 18:04:24 GMT -5
Lol it's funny, I had thought about bringing up something like this before too, I like this!
What would we do for categories? I have a few in mind...
Best Player Ever Best Villain Worst Player Best Showmance Funniest iSurv1vor Contestant Best iSurv1vor Twist Worst iSurv1vor Twist
Let's think up some ideas!
|
|
|
Post by Tom on Jun 29, 2009 18:11:38 GMT -5
I think this'll be a phenomenal thing to do after FvF ends. 12 seasons of material will be great! Some other categories... Best Quote ("safe from tribal council!") Best Winner Best Runner-Up Best First Boot I was also thinking that if we use voting with this that the people who have been around for more of the seasons should get more weight added to their votes than those that haven't been around as long. You see what I'm saying? Because otherwise all the Peru people won't have much reason to vote for things that took place in the earlier seasons (and other later season people too, haha, not just singling out Peru). So like I would get more weight than Alyssa since I've been around sinceChina, but Sandy would have the greatest weight of all since he's obviously been around for every single season. Make sense? But yes, add more categories! This'll be great.
|
|
|
Post by Park on Jun 29, 2009 18:19:20 GMT -5
Worst winner Best Player that Never Won
|
|
|
Post by Alyssa on Jun 29, 2009 18:22:19 GMT -5
i dont know about the weight thing? because like if you've been around a long long time then you might auto-win even if someone new gets more votes. and i dont wanna wait til fvf is over. i want it now now
|
|
|
Post by Alyssa on Jun 29, 2009 18:28:12 GMT -5
category ideas:
- best rivalry - best hidden alias - biggest dictator - biggest game fuck up [person] - bitchiest player
|
|
|
Post by andy on Jun 29, 2009 18:28:44 GMT -5
lol but what if the newest best player ever is from this season? then they don't get the award and this thing loses a little credibility.
I also like the weighted thing as well. No offense, Alyssa, but your not familiar with guys like Richard and Skylar, whereas Sandy and Tom are. Not to mention, your idea of the worst player ever is probably different from say, my own idea, (and most people who were around at the time will agree with me with who that is).
Maybe we could do a mix of both weighted votes and general votes overall..
Say maybe with the Best Player Ever award, maybe Sandy could give a brief description of say 5 candidates to give the newbies an idea on who really should be at the top and that could help make the decision easier. Then we actually might not have to require weighted votes after all? Maybe? Lemme know what you think of that everyone!
|
|
|
Post by andy on Jun 29, 2009 18:29:27 GMT -5
category ideas: - best hidden alias Whoever we haven't figured out yet! Or I could just admit it that I'm an alias. My real name is Pablo! lol jk.....or am I???
|
|
|
Post by Park on Jun 29, 2009 18:31:04 GMT -5
Bud
|
|
|
Post by Alyssa on Jun 29, 2009 18:31:55 GMT -5
well then maybe the PLAYERS should nominate people and then sandy can pick the winners, seeing as he's been here for everything.
|
|
|
Post by justin on Jun 29, 2009 18:34:17 GMT -5
Face it. Nobody is gonna be happy with these anyway and who gives a shit if you were around longer? Does that make any of us less worthy of having votes or even having a say in what goes on?
If you're going to do these, I agree with Andy. Let Sandy run them and put descriptions in for each nominee so people who arent quite as familiar with past players get a good idea of why they are nominated for the award in the first place. This whole, "Oh Ive been here the longest, so I get better priveleges" is kinda lame and annoying.
|
|
|
Post by Alyssa on Jun 29, 2009 18:42:05 GMT -5
I agree with justin. I'd be okay with having like 5 nominees for each category and maybe like only 1 from each season so one season doesn't dominate the whole awards. and then everyone get a brief overview of the person and vote by that.
|
|
|
Post by Sandy on Jun 29, 2009 19:09:11 GMT -5
Loves the idea, definitely could be fun!! I understand what Tom is saying. Obv, some people have been around longer than others, thus knowing a lot more of the characters who've played this game. This gives people who've been around longer and have seen more iSurv1vor a sorta, like, "fair" vote. They've seen a lot so their opinions are based off more than like, "who they know." With the newer alum, they haven't seen a lot of iSurv1vor so they'd be more inclined to vote for their season, or friend, yanno? I mean, we did similar award polls during pre-game in Allstars. And of course, most people voted for their seasons. Like ALL Hawaii people voted Hawaii in every poll. I mean, of course, they were around for Hawaii and know Hawaii the best, but it makes it lame in terms of voting because it's like you're wearing blinders. I do like Alyssa's idea of everyone nominating people for catagoies, and myself picking the winners. But that idea is less fun because there's not voting and I like voting . If we choose to do it where I'll nominate people and give descriptions, I'll provide links so people can perhaps so some 'reasearch' from past seasons so they can make an educated vote.
|
|